翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem : ウィキペディア英語版
Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem

In mathematics, specifically in real analysis, the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem, named after Bernard Bolzano and Karl Weierstrass, is a fundamental result about convergence in a finite-dimensional Euclidean space R''n''. The theorem states that
each bounded sequence in R''n'' has a convergent subsequence.〔Bartle and Sherbert 2000, p. 78 (for R).〕 An equivalent formulation is that a subset of R''n'' is sequentially compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.〔Fitzpatrick 2006, p. 52 (for R), p. 300 (for R''n'').〕 The theorem is sometimes called the sequential compactness theorem.〔Fitzpatrick 2006, p. xiv.〕
== Proof ==

First we prove the theorem when ''n'' = 1, in which case the ordering on R can be put to good use. Indeed, we have the following result.
Lemma: Every sequence in R has a monotone subsequence.
Proof: Let us call a positive integer ''n'' a "peak of the sequence" if ''m'' > ''n'' implies    ''i.e.'', if  ''x''''n'' is greater than every subsequent term in the sequence. Suppose first that the sequence has infinitely many peaks, ''n''1 < ''n''2 < ''n''3 < … < ''n''''j'' < …. Then the subsequence  \  corresponding to these peaks is monotonically decreasing, and we are done. So suppose now that there are only finitely many peaks, let ''N'' be the last peak and . Then ''n''1 is not a peak, since , which implies the existence of an with  x_ \geq x_.  Again, is not a peak, hence there is with x_ \geq x_.  Repeating this process leads to an infinite non-decreasing subsequence  x_ \leq x_ \leq x_ \leq \ldots, as desired.〔Bartle and Sherbert 2000, pp. 78-79.〕
Now suppose we have a bounded sequence in R; by the Lemma there exists a monotone subsequence, necessarily bounded. It follows from the monotone convergence theorem that this subsequence must converge.
Finally, the general case can be easily reduced to the case of ''n'' = 1 as follows: given a bounded sequence in R''n'', the sequence of first coordinates is a bounded real sequence, hence has a convergent subsequence. We can then extract a subsubsequence on which the second coordinates converge, and so on, until in the end we have passed from the original sequence to a subsequence ''n'' times — which is still a subsequence of the original sequence — on which each coordinate sequence converges, hence the subsequence itself is convergent.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.